Loading page
Loading page
PipDig adheres to strict guidelines to preserve editorial integrity to help you make decisions with confidence. Some of the reviews and content we feature on this site are supported by affiliate partnerships from which this website may receive money. This may impact how, where and which companies / services we review and write about. Our team of experts works to continually re-evaluate the reviews and information we provide on all the top Forex / CFD brokerages featured here.
NovaTrade and Harborstone Capital are illustrative sample records, not real firms. This page demonstrates how a head-to-head comparison is laid out.
Tier-1 regulation with active-trader pricing and advanced add-ons
| Compare | NovaTradeSample data | Harborstone CapitalSample data |
|---|---|---|
| Regulators | FinCEN | FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA |
| Year Established | 2018 | 2010 |
| Execution Type(s) | Market Maker | ECN/STP |
| Minimum Deposit | $50 | $0 |
| Average Trading Cost EUR/USD | N/A | 0.1 pips + $7.00 |
| Average Trading Cost GBP/USD | N/A | 0.4 pips + $7.00 |
| Average Trading Cost Gold | N/A | $0.15 |
| Max Leverage | 1:20 | 1:400 |
| Trading Platform(s) | Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Account | — | |
| Negative Balance Protection | — | |
| Visit Broker | Read Review |
Harborstone Capital takes the overall win with a score of 4.6 against 4.3. Harborstone Capital is our pick for active and algorithmic traders who refuse to compromise on regulation: Tier-1 licences, published execution statistics, and the deepest platform stack in this review.
That said, NovaTrade remains the better choice for some traders: best copy trading option for u.s. traders. Compare the account types and confirm which legal entity would onboard you before deciding.
Read the full NovaTrade review →
Read the full Harborstone Capital review →